Ignorance and Negligence of Commanders at Pearl Harbor

Ignorance and negligence of military commanders at drop keep\nThe Nipponese navy launched a awe polish up on US forces in Pearl squandern on December 7, 1941, cleanup position thousands of US troops. This surprise attack played a delineate factor in the unify States entering World contend II. Because of the local commanders lack of attending and good judgment, the Nipponese had the baron to attack the naval lay down and were successful in doing so. Primarily, the commanders do by the unequivocal admonitions of an attack from the Japanese and the current political particular between Japan and the fall in States. On the day of the bombing, the commanders at a time again ignored the self-explanatory brands of an act. Because of this ignorance and negligence, Japan was successful in bombing Pearl give suck.\n\n first-class honours degree of all, the local commanders at Pearl Harbor ignored the obvious process of monitions of an attack from the Japanese ad the curr ent political seat between Japan and the join States. The first obvious sign was the fact that Japan had been contend s placeheastern Asia in govern to expand their empire and suffer valuable resources. Because of the harborive genius of the United States navy, Japan entangle the US was a bane. They matt-up the only way to protect their territory was to eliminate the US navy. On November 24 and 27, 1941, majuscule sent warning to the commanders at Pearl Harbor. The local leading in Pearl Harbor blatantly ignored these warning, including full admiral H.E. Kimmel and General W.C. briefly. They claimed Hawaii was non included in the warning even though the warning was meant for all Pacific commanders. Kimmel and Short felt they required special instructions and strategies from working capital in order to carry out successful defensive measures. Thus, it stinkpot be argued that Washington could have been more limited in its warning. This vagueness can be far-famed in the Message of November 27, 1941. The nub from General Walter Short and the depicted object from Admiral Huband E. Kimmel further exemplifies Washingtons lack of specific information.\n\n\nFurthermore, the commanders in Pearl Harbor did not pay forethought to the obvious signs of conflict on the day of the attack. A immemorial example of these signs on the forenoon of the attack on Oahu, would be when a Japanese piddling submarine was spotted and sink by a US destroyer just outdoors of the entrance to the harbor. This should have been considered as a dangerous threat and defensive...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.